Just because someone may not know everything, or be right, doesn't mean that right does not exist. I've seen this argument used to excuse moral relativism. "Nobody knows everything. Nobody can be right. Therefore there is no such thing as right and, by extension, wrong."
Not knowing everything or being right cannot be an excuse to say that one CAN'T know everything or be right. Rather it should be motivation to learn more and search for what is right, what is true, as opposed to saying, "Well screw it. There's no such thing as right, so I'm not even going to look, because it can't be obtained."
There is real science, and real scientists who follow where the evidence leads as opposed to popular science and scientists who start out with preconceived ideas and cherry pick data that support that idea. The latter cannot be called science. The latter is marketing.
It looks like the federal cartel is running a modern day slave trade and they are using our money to do it.
What is currently happening in the UK is a direct result of good men doing nothing for too long, and it will happen here in the US to varying degrees and varying success depending on the state. Given these facts, there is still hope if the people are willing to turn back to God. In other news I will be making a slight change of venue and format, coming home to my people, gamer geeks.
I haven't looked too much into this, but apparently there are some proponents of the fallacy of evolution who are getting tired of having the Second Law of Thermodynamics thrown in their face and are now suggesting that it, the Second Law, has "changed."
As pathetic as it is, this is a dodge frequently used by people whose belief systems fall apart in the face of Reality. Instead of accepting that they are wrong, they seek to "redefine" and / or "re-imagine" that aspect of Reality which so offends their fantasy life be it an immutable scientific law, the nature of linguistics, or the very nature of Reality itself, constantly contradicting their own arguments in the process.
One philosopher wrote a book in which he reasoned that humans did not have the capacity for reason. Another wrote a book in which he used language to make the definitive statement that language is too inadequate to be able to make definitive statements.
Objective Reality exists. It will win EVERY, SINGLE, TIME. Reality...
As it is now a foregone conclusion that Nancy Pelosi's Nephew is going to be installed as the Democrat Cartel's 2028 presidential nominee, he is following the only strategy they have left, the "referendum on Trump."
The Democrats do not have a single issue upon which to hang their collective hats. Indeed, their track record since Obama has been one of intentional, malicious destruction. So all they can do is paint their political opponents with the worst ad hominem historically available without any evidence and then say, "At least we are not as bad as them."